With
Saturday, March 7, 2009
How To Put Stereo In Jon Boat
Durban II: Nothing but hopefully
With
Italian government's decision, and four countries would not participate in the summit Durban II on Racism and Xenophobia to be held in Geneva in late April. The reason? Be an excuse for acting like those who say fight: in a racist manner. With
The first alert to the fact it was the Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni , who made a call to "refuse to give legitimacy to hatred, extremism and anti-Semitism under the banner of the struggle against racism." He complains
joined the voices of the government of the United States and Canada and more recently the entire the European Union, which last week struck on Muslim guidance could have the meeting, sponsored by the United Nations.
On this Islamization (no surprise with a UN acting as the 2 / 3 by Arab and Islamic nations), will return later. For now, I want to draw attention to the reasons of the countries that have refused to participate in the conference: the essentially anti-Semitic of the summit, embodied not only in its participants, but in what appears to be the content of the document search adopted at the Conference.
The alert was issued by the academic Anne Bayefksy in National Review. Your article on , Bayefsky gives interesting information about the reason for the conference, its origins, etc., And places particular emphasis on the draft resolution may be issued at the end of the conference.
In it, the signatory nations boast of their anti-Semitism disguised as criticism of Israeli policies in the Palestinian territories, to ensure that they are a "violation of human rights, a crime against humanity and a contemporary form of apartheid "(emphasis mine). Besides
ignore the true nature of the conflict (the terror generated by Hamas in the border areas with Israel), the document referred to almost exclusively to Israeli policies, while other topics (such as Holocaust denial or crimes committed in Sudan) touches only tangentially or deliberately ignored.
The terms of this statement strikingly reminiscent of a similar one in 1975 when the UN passed a resolution promoted by the Ugandan dictator Idi Amin (the same commanded to erect a statue of Hitler in his country) which equated Zionism with racism. A resolution which, as recalled Bayefksy , "tainted any other relevant resolutions up to 1991) and remember statements also alleged" rights rapporteurs Human "absolutely biased to have called" Bantustans "the fence that has separated Israel from the West Bank territory.
Why be surprised then, when it is clear the spirit prevailing in a UN anti-Israel dominated by the left and the filoislamismo? In an organization with these characteristics can only expect a result of that nature.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment