the style A novel Little Women, a classic. But the difference with other similar novels is the characterization of characters that makes you feel closer to them as though they live in times past. The most interesting story is difficult to see what life was like for a girl with more interest than marry a good game. So is the character of the protagonist of this story: Elizabeth Bennet, played excellently by Keyra Knightley in the film version . So the story goes: a mother whose only concern is that their daughters marry well, a wise parent who nevertheless does not commit a lot and let things happen and 5 daughters of which the most interesting are the 2 biggest: Lizzy (Elizabeth) and Jane.
During the course of the novel they appear many interesting characters that make the relationships between them. Especially Darcy and Mr. Bingley (the gallants of the two major Bennet).
Darcy is an enigmatic character that makes one, together with the protagonist, wants to unravel the hidden reality.
For those who already read the book I recommend watching the film, for those who saw the movie and were captivated by the story, I recommend reading at least the last two chapters of the book have a bit more where remains the film.
My favorite characters: Darcy and Lizzy
The most interesting The author, Jane Austen. Who lived at the same time the story of the book, which makes one have an idea of \u200b\u200bwhat it was like in those years for someone with thoughts that went beyond the ordinary. Fragment
chosen at random: "If Lizzy had had to base their opinion on marital happiness in the example of his own family, would never have come to a conclusion very encouraging. Seduced by the beauty and youth, or rather, by appearances of the two, his father married a women, whose lack of intelligence and mean-spirited abundance had killed the real love in a very short time after the wedding. Esteem, respect and trust between both partners were gone forever, and all illusions of a happy home had vanished without a remedy. But Mr. Bennet had no character to drown his disappointment in pleasures, that too often serve as comfort to many men who have been unhappy because of their follies or vices. He was very fond of the countryside and reading and encrypting the main distractions in the satisfaction of those tastes. To his wife he was very little, not for fun that sought their ignorance and stupidity. Actually this is not the kind of happiness that a husband would be due to his wife, but a good philosopher knows how to use the absence of other hobbies, those who offer "
