Wednesday, November 4, 2009

Sudden Black And Blue On Ankle

A Love




Daddy ...
A kiss for breakfast. so sexy

Saturday, October 3, 2009

Sudden Menstrual Bleeding

Wiesenthal Center against anti-Semitism in Honduras

PRESS


Buenos Aires, October 2, 2009


Antisemitism in Honduras: The Wiesenthal Center urges

the Secretary General of the OAS to condemn racist claims Radio Globo


Simon Wiesenthal Center asked the OAS Secretary General Jose Miguel Insulza, a proclamation condemning anti-Semitic Radio Globo director of Honduras, David Romero.


On Friday September 25, 2009, Romero reiterated his support for President Manuel Zelaya said that Honduras "are incapable of doing evil, if anything, can be complicit wickedness of others "then added that" sometimes I wonder if Hitler had no reason to have finished this race with the famous Holocaust. If people hurt in this country are Jews, the Israelites. I want this afternoon here on Radio Globo say, by name, who are both Jewish army officers who are working with the Armed Forces of our country and is being commissioned to do all these activities of conspiracy and covert action and all what is happening to the President. After I found out I wonder why we do not allow Hitler to fulfill its historic mission. Excuse me suddenly grotesque expression. But I wonder after I realize of this and much more. I think it should have been fair and valid that Hitler had finished his historical vision. "


In a letter to Secretary General Insulza, Dr. Shimon Samuels (Director for International Relations of the SWC) and Sergio Widder (Director for Latin America) stressed that "this demonstration unacceptable of racism and antisemitism happened after the statements by President Zelaya to Argentine news channel TN, from the Brazilian Embassy in Tegucigalpa, arguing that 'we are bombarded electronic equipment electronic high frequency ultrasound waves are causing us distress on health (...) with devices that are supposed to have provided the Israelites'. "


"The words of Mr. Romero is a direct consequence of the speech of President Zelaya. The OAS can not remain indifferent, particularly when significant efforts to restore the normal institutional Honduras, "said Samuels.


"We urge the Secretary General Insulza to condemn unequivocally on behalf of the OAS, any manifestation of anti-Semitism and particularly the words of the director of Radio Globo of Honduras, who has used a serious institutional crisis as a pretext to promote its agenda of incitement hatred and intolerance, he said Widder.


For more information, contact Sergio Widder at 4802-1744 or (15) 4425-1306. If calling from outside Argentina, + 5411 4802-1744 or + 54911 4425-1306 .


Simon Wiesenthal Center is an international Jewish human rights with more than 400,000 members worldwide. It is an NGO with UN, UNESCO, OAS, OSCE, Council of Europe and the Latin American Parliament.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Invitation Wording For Third Birthday

CAIV to reject Ahmadinejad's statements


The Confederation of Jewish Associations of Venezuela, on behalf of the country's Jewish community, has issued its categorical rejection of evil statements of Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who distort the historical truth insists on denying the Holocaust in which they were massacred six million Jews by the Nazi regime.

Ahmadinejad, with insolence and treachery, repeats this message of hate, cynically delivered while we were celebrating the arrival of a new Jewish year marked the 70 anniversary of the beginning of World War II. This not only desecrates the memory of the victims of the worst genocide in history fully documented, but it offends the survivors, many of whom have tattoos on their arms with indelible Nazi barbarism which marked his victims.

Not satisfied with this, in his speech at the 64th UN General Assembly, insisted on blaming Jews for all the ills of mankind with his accusations of domination "of politics, economy and culture of the majority of world ... establishing a new form of slavery and damaging the reputation of other nations ... "

As Venezuelan Jews, and community members are still living many of those who suffered firsthand the horrors of the camps, their children and grandchildren, we strongly condemn and with one voice, the unprecedented anti-Semitic remarks of President Iran who also is calling for the destruction of Israel, a country that unite us deep ancestral ties.

urge national and international community to reject these positions and to spare no efforts to strengthen peace, coexistence and mutual respect among peoples and nations of the world.

Caracas, September 24, 2009

Monday, April 20, 2009

Can Sinus Infection Raise Blood Pressure

Those who went to Durban II




denier Ahmadinejad's statements, paradoxically, the president of a summit on racism, were no surprise. Has followed a line of open confrontation with the West and particularly against the representation of the West in a retrograde Middle East, as is Israel. His epithets toward the Jewish state as a "racist state", etc. Are not therefore something that should not be expected.

Nor is it surprising the reaction of the countries that withdrew from the Conference. Aside from the nine who decided from the outset not to participate in this circus anti-Western and islamophile that is Durban II (Israel, USA, Canada, Italy, Australia, Netherlands, Poland, New Zealand and Germany), another important group of Western nations, including Denmark, which has fought a European Islamization freedom of expression and France, who kept his promise to retire if the forum became what was to become, withdrew amid the Iranian president's verbal diarrhea.

More than those who left the room at the summit held in Geneva, it is necessary to highlight those who remained, including two cases that can generate more disappointed.
The first was the representation at the conference of the Holy See that, as confirmed by the spokesman Angelo Lombardi did not leave the room, causing new tensions between the Vatican and world Jewry, even after Pope Benedict XVI himself qualify the initiative as "very important."

The second unfortunate passivity during the first day of the conference itself was the UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon, who, although he later condemned Ahmadinejad's speech claiming that "no country can offend another in UN "did nothing to stop it at the time, as downloaded from the podium or get his attention, and even publicly showed his displeasure by withdrawing enclosure,
as did many other delegations.



Quite the contrary, the main criticism of Ban was against those who criticized and finally decided to boycott this paraphernalia "racist."

Friday, April 17, 2009

What Do Women Like About Hugh Jackman

Durban II: Two reflections

"It is important to understand that while criticism of Israel is antisemitic in itself, there are some that are clearly, even though the word 'Jew' is never mentioned." This phrase, coined by scholar American Alan Dershowitz describes exactly what happens with the modification of the final declaration for the summit raised Durban II 'racism and xenophobia " (Quotes themselves) that begin next week.

And, according review the Israeli daily Yediot Aharonot , although the statement "omits references to the state of Israel or Zionism," keeping in touch condemning Israeli military operations and confirm what I concluded in Durban, held in South Africa, characterized by a severe criticism of Israeli policy.

As argued in this space months ago , all these elements were quite predictable, given the nature of the participants in Durban summit will be led nothing more and nothing less than Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, notorious for being an avowed Holocaust denier and open intentions to "wipe Israel off the map." What is really worrying is that sit next to Ban Ki Moon, secretary general of the United Nations ... Another example of what the true "rule" that governs the international community that the U.S. is not far from the Israeli, but the rule of Arab and Islamic terror, embodied, as we have said, in a General Assembly composed mainly of countries covered by that Islamism rather than religion, has become a real ideology and praxis of international politics.

Tuesday, April 14, 2009

2007 Honda Pilot Whistle

Netanyahu keys. Another article in Haaretz


A lack of analysis "in depth" of the training process of the Netanyahu government (not developed here due to reasons such as lack of time and speed of events), I share this interview which makes the daily Haaretz to Israel Bachar and Kalman Gayer, campaign advisers Netanyahu and Livni respectively.

There, after several weeks of rest of the events, both experts share some of the steps followed to develop the campaign and develop the messages of both leaders.

The link is: Http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1078454.html

Numbness In Leg & Stomach



Denmark gives another irreverent show that is well above the trend Islamized hanging over Europe since early this decade. The first step was the publication in the edition of December 30, 2005 the Danish newspaper Jyllands-Posten, a caricature of Muhammad wearing a bomb in his turban. The drawing, which sought to chart the Islamic radicalism, aroused the wrath of this very radicalism that reinvindicó its "peaceful nature" with violent demonstrations and attacks on U.S. Embassies in major Arab nations in a "very civilized attempt" to show his displeasure.

Now is the Free Press Association Denmark which proves to value freedom of expression over anti-Western outbursts, to promote mass printing of 20,000 copies of the cartoon.

This link , the editor of Jyllands-Posten justify printing and makes important reflections on freedom of expression as a value for the West.

Moreover, the artist himself at the time tried to explain that his drawings were seeking to highlight the "Islamic radicalism" and not to condemn Islam as a whole. The reactions of the world Muslim (including death threats against him) however, seemed to show that either are not as far apart as we have tried to show in a "politically correct"

Sunday, April 5, 2009

Vertigo From Elevators

islamofilia step against "Israel and Palestine: Time for plan B" Nathan Brown article

In the context of statements by the new minister Foreign Affairs, Avigdor Lieberman, on the "peace for peace, (I will discuss in this space in coming days) and at the apparent failure of initiatives such as the Annapolis conference and Roadmap , got this analysis of the Carnegie Endowment for Peace , Professor Nathan Brown. I find it interesting the pragmatism of his perspective, and therefore I invite you to visit.

The website is: http://www.carnegieendowment.org/publications/index.cfm?fa=view&id=22792&prog=zgp&proj=zme

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

How To Remain Invisible In Facebook Chat

The BBC is biased

That is the conclusion which came a report published this week by Honest Reporting , an organization in charge of monitoring anti-Semitism in the media, after examining the coverage of "Operation Cast Lead" in the Gaza Strip by the BBC television company .

reaching such a statement, the organization studied elements in the coverage of the conflict, seeking the dismantling and destruction networks of the terrorist movement Hamas. The elements studied were the number of witnesses interviewed by one side to another, pictures and phrases highlighted at the time of covering the conflict, among others.

hallazgosmás One of the highlights of the report was the credibility that was given to the bombing of a school in the United Nations (UN) by the Israeli army, which was later proven false , as the missiles fell distance considerable school and also caused the death of a group

The full report can be read (in English) in this link of the organization, in the case of Venezuela has been released by the National Association of Journalists in their newsletter

Thursday, March 19, 2009

Akiba-online Streaming

Islamized "Benedict XVI? Nasrallah and his defeats


The Pope Benedict XVI's position on controversial issues is, at best, contradictory. The latest example is its outright rejection of condom use during your visit to Cameroon, to ensure it is not the solution to the problem of AIDS, something like to mention the home of the hanging rope. However, where it is most appreciated such contradictions is in two events, seemingly unrelated, may (at least in theory) have some concatenation: Islam and the Holocaust.

In the case of Islam, began papal tension proclaimed after mid-September 2006 that it is a religion that promotes violence. Paradoxically, it was to have reason in his words what he did retract them after the angry reaction of the Islamic world.

"
For the careful reader of my text, it is clear that in no way wanted to make my own the negative words pronounced by the medieval emperor and their polemical content does not reflect my personal conviction. My intention was to explain that religion and violence do not go together "said a frightened Ratzinger on 20 September of that year.

Since then, the Vatican's position towards Islam has been progressively more submissive. Covered in what the "interreligious dialogue", Benedict seems to have fallen into islamofilia now wanders around Europe, to avoid issues such as terrorism or Iranian fundamentalism.

Regarding the Holocaust, the positions of the Benedict XVI also eg CAN ambiguous, especially as regards their attitudes to soft denial. For while it is true that (after
the incessant complaints of the Jewish community worldwide) demanded an apology from the priest denier Richard Williamson, the fact remains that insists exc ulpar Pius XII for passivity which, according to passed into history, acted against the Nazi regime. Even officially announced that not visit the entire museum of Yad Vashem ( Authority memorial for Holocaust Victims and Martyrs ) to avoid seeing the heading which accuses the so-called "Hitler's Pope" for having remained "neutral" versus the Nazi regime.

Approach to the Islamic world vs. removal of one of the main themes of contemporary Judaism ... Coincidence?

Saturday, March 14, 2009

License Plate Template

announced

"... Today we commemorate the birth of our Prophet (...) Today, tomorrow, in a year, a hundred years, in a thousand years and up the end of time, we, our children, our grandchildren and generations to come, while we will not recognize Israel Hezbollah (applause) We are able to fight this entity (Israel), and even to destroy it ... " (highlights added).




With these words, Hassan Nasrallah, leader of the maximum Lebanese terrorist group Hezbollah, has confirmed the hypothesis that we have handled over several months on this blog: that the worst enemy Arabs in the Middle East are themselves. A historical facts already discussed, such as Black September , and strife between Sunnis and Shiites, Fatah and Hamas, etc., Joins the deep detachment that seem to feel the "great leaders" as Nasrallah or Hamas leaders to its people.

What do you look with this incendiary speech Nasrallah? "Exacerbating the spirits of his followers to engage in further attacks against northern Israel, ignoring the thunderous defeat and the terrible consequences it had the Second Lebanon War two years ago?

addition to not worry about their people (like Hamas did not either when t UVO in its hands the opportunity to maintain the truce ) Nasrallah lies in predicting the destruction of Israel.


was not possible in 1949 in 1967 or 1973, with the armies of three Arab countries against him. It was not possible with every decade since 1980 intifada. It was not possible, even with a UN deeply pro-Arab public opinion and victimization for the Palestinian cause. And it is not possible because two liderzuelos like Nasrallah and Ahmadinejad (both friends of President Chávez, by the way) revived the old pan-Arabist intentions to launch the state of Israel to the Mediterranean.


The only way to achieve peace in the Middle East is that Arab radicalism once understand that the state of Israel is an undeniable reality that will be felt even more with the seemingly inevitable arrival right to power in the nation.

Friday, March 13, 2009

Hi, I Also Need A Driver For Samsung Scx-4x16

breakfast kiss between different cultures. VIRTUAL SEX



meet with the man or woman you loved the distance is only one of the situations that a hefty percentage of couples in love and decide to meet face internet experience at the time of breaking the barrier of space. When they are

in the same place, everything is different, positively or negatively different.
Merely to endure an intense affection distance is a great test.
But others still get stronger and more important as the intentions for both parties are really serious.
Because families are not painted on the wall at more than one family will look like a crazy idea a courtship with these characteristics.
Although not always the case.
Everything is becoming a reality for the rest when you finally see the couple together. Just
really begin to believe that they both spoke of love or love. United
both in the same physical plane the relationship becomes stronger.
Disbelief before the game and negative thoughts toward the dating relationship that has been made public, is another test that will call Reaffirmation of feelings. Pol
harder
When he first visited my apartment in Barranquilla, its main purpose was to meet my mother, hard nut to crack.
was a very tense environment, interrogations and investigations in that first interview, but he proudly came out victorious.
But my mother could only see in it the picture of my father in his youth when in love and convinced her to marry at age 19. For those unfamiliar with my life because that is a bad thing, because my mother was separated my dad's in very bad terms with the memory of a past year of living full of silences, annoyances and complaints.
Well is not easy either for some parents give their only child, much less practically a stranger.
Assumptions and perhaps negative experiences lived by people in the environment, they can think things twice before venturing into married life.
is thought twice or more before saying yes accept a boyfriend of years, then logically one should think even more if the marriage is between two people just meet and have also lived in different countries.
I heard many times people that marriage is a lottery.
I bet all the jackpot and won. Although all delivery means a waiver.

I gave shape to my dream of being happy with a man who loved me for a lifetime and perhaps resigned to see my cousins \u200b\u200bgrow and their children born, I quit to share and celebrate good times and sad with my family.
not only family and start a new life beside the one you love is also changing country and customs.
Not all models of married life offer both partners the right space for their fulfillment as individuals and as groups, to establish healthy patterns of interaction and to serve as a healthy heart a new family. Relational schemas are influenced by culture. But these schemes do not always meet because they often sacrifice one of the partners.
Sometimes culture is right in the design of these roles and the formation of the patterns of relationship between man and woman, between parents and children. For the fruit known successes say.
But culture often misses. Culture can not be regarded as an absolute to which people are killed. Must serve the people.

The love between persons of the same continent are much easier because for example the Latin culture is almost the same everywhere.
However, although English is spoken in South America the meanings of words vary widely.
And this is another test of patience.
is very easy to fall in love but really it is better not to jump into marriage.
Marriage contains more than signatures on paper and a big party.
Marriage is the beginning of a story and the creation of a family.

If your love is strong enough to withstand the adversities, the differences, cultures and above all strong enough to fight together for the same goals, then up the bride and groom! And working for always being happy.







Saturday, March 7, 2009

How To Put Stereo In Jon Boat

Durban II: Nothing but hopefully

With
Italian government's decision, and four countries would not participate in the summit Durban II on Racism and Xenophobia to be held in Geneva in late April. The reason? Be an excuse for acting like those who say fight: in a racist manner.

The first alert to the fact it was the Israeli Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni , who made a call to "refuse to give legitimacy to hatred, extremism and anti-Semitism under the banner of the struggle against racism." He complains

joined the voices of the government of the United States and Canada and more recently the entire the European Union, which last week struck on Muslim guidance could have the meeting, sponsored by the United Nations.

On this Islamization (no surprise with a UN acting as the 2 / 3 by Arab and Islamic nations), will return later. For now, I want to draw attention to the reasons of the countries that have refused to participate in the conference: the essentially anti-Semitic of the summit, embodied not only in its participants, but in what appears to be the content of the document search adopted at the Conference.

The alert was issued by the academic Anne Bayefksy in National Review. Your article on , Bayefsky gives interesting information about the reason for the conference, its origins, etc., And places particular emphasis on the draft resolution may be issued at the end of the conference.

In it, the signatory nations boast of their anti-Semitism disguised as criticism of Israeli policies in the Palestinian territories, to ensure that they are a "violation of human rights, a crime against humanity and a contemporary form of apartheid "(emphasis mine). Besides

ignore the true nature of the conflict (the terror generated by Hamas in the border areas with Israel), the document referred to almost exclusively to Israeli policies, while other topics (such as Holocaust denial or crimes committed in Sudan) touches only tangentially or deliberately ignored.

The terms of this statement strikingly reminiscent of a similar one in 1975 when the UN passed a resolution promoted by the Ugandan dictator Idi Amin (the same commanded to erect a statue of Hitler in his country) which equated Zionism with racism. A resolution which, as recalled Bayefksy , "tainted any other relevant resolutions up to 1991) and remember statements also alleged" rights rapporteurs Human "absolutely biased to have called" Bantustans "the fence that has separated Israel from the West Bank territory.

Why be surprised then, when it is clear the spirit prevailing in a UN anti-Israel dominated by the left and the filoislamismo? In an organization with these characteristics can only expect a result of that nature.